The Strategy Wonk Blog
Posted on: February 09, 2012
by Tom DeSanto, Strategy Wonk
Recently, McDonald’s ran an ad in which they said, "Eating a Chicken McBite was less risky than petting a stray pit bull, shaving your head, naming your son Sue or giving friends your Facebook password." The ad enraged pit bull owners and McDonalds was forced to apologize.
Most people believe that McDonald’s greatest error was offending pit bull owners, prompting them to attack. Who could blame them? Why should advertising reinforce negative stereotypes about people—or pets? That error was very public. And it was handled appropriately with an apology. The less obvious error was in McDonald’s messaging.
Why would the ad headline compare the safety of eating Chicken McBites with petting a pit bull? Where was the product benefit for Chicken McBites? Getting attention is essential in a crowded marketplace. True. But not delivering a clear benefit? Big mistake.
Should advertising entertain? Yes. Should it inform? Yes. Can it be clever enough to gain attention and deliver an indelible benefit at the same time? Absolutely. That’s the goal. The marketplace is full of misdirected messaging, incomplete in leaving impressions that move the intellect and emotion toward brand affinity and product purchase.
McDonald’s is often on the mark. Their miss has a message that goes beyond reminding us about audience sensitivity and avoiding potential problems. If you stick to messages specifically germane to enhancing your brand and selling your product, you’ll have audiences “Lovin’ it.”
Posted on: March 06, 2012
by Tom DeSanto, Strategy Wonk
Today we celebrate the 100th birthday of the Oreo®, a beloved cookie and iconic American brand.
But did you know that the Oreo was preceded in the marketplace by a remarkably similar cookie called the Hydrox? In 1908, the fledgling Sunshine Biscuit Company launched Hydrox, which rapidly became its flagship product.
Hydrox would have celebrated its 100th birthday in 2008. Instead, its obituary ran in the Wall Street Journal: “The Hydrox Cookie is Dead and Fans Won’t Get Over It.” (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120069573721101481.html)
Why is one cookie in the grave and another is a healthy centenarian?
Was Oreo the superior product?
Arguably not. Hydrox cookies had a loyal following. One review stated that Hydrox had a “tangy, less-sweet filling and a crunchier cookie that stood up better to milk.” In a taste tasted conducted by Advertising Age in Manhattan in 1988, the final score was Hydrox 29, Oreo 16.
Two major product differences stand out among the cookie contenders. Hydrox contained no lard and was granted kosher certification. The Oreo contained lard and was granted U.S. Patent #0093009.
Many marketing pundits believe the real difference in longevity can be attributed to Nabisco’s superior marketing muscle and distribution capability. In the battle for market share, Hydrox never really had a chance.
A number of marketing missteps also led to Hydrox’s demise. In 1991, the Hydrox brand was revamped and represented by a character named Drox. Unfortunately, Drox soon bit the dust because he too closely resembled the Pillsbury Doughboy. Pillsbury sued and won.
In 1996, Hydrox cookies were reformulated with added sweetness and renamed "Droxies" to increase their appeal among children. Although reminiscent of Coke’s 1985 reformulation blunder, abandonment of the classic recipe was never repealed. The once-famous Hydrox cookie slipped into oblivion by 2003. A brief reprise occurred in 2008.
And then kaput.
Happy Birthday to Oreo, a great product given a long life by consistent and clever marketing. A visit to http://www.nabiscoworld.com/oreo/birthday shows why.
Celebrating 100 years, Oreo is one smart cookie.
Chirps vs. Buzz - 05/01/2013
Don't Blow It. - 02/07/2013
Ten Pillars for Developing Effective Creative Strategy - 10/17/2012
The Care & Nurturing of Volunteers - 10/09/2012
The ACLU, KKK and You - 06/27/2012
WSJ. WTF? - 05/15/2012
Understanding Earth Day - 04/20/2012
The IRS: Looking for Love - 04/17/2012
Branding is Believing - 03/14/2012
Happy Birthday to One Smart Cookie - 03/06/2012
Look Before You Leap. (No Bull) - 02/29/2012
Food for Thought: Organically Grown vs. Processed Reputations - 02/22/2012
Bitter Branding - 02/14/2012
Misdirected Messaging Bites Back - 02/09/2012
The Super Hole - 02/08/2012
Food for Thought: Organically Grown vs. Processed Reputations
Madri said: that Real Kobe 9 [more]
Ten Pillars for Developing Effective Creative Strategy
Case said: Casey futureKobe 10 cheap [more]
© 2015 HALPERIN CREATIVE, LLC.
Denver, Colorado, USA